White Dinner Jacket in the Country

Chantilly in northern France isn’t the most appropriate place for a white dinner jacket, even in summertime. But even more untraditional is a black tie event taking place in the afternoon (well, it’s supposed to be the evening). These circumstances somewhat justify two untraditional elements of Bond’s dinner jacket. The most noticeable is the notch lapels, as opposed to the more traditional shawl collar or peak lapels on a dinner jacket. The other untraditional part of this dinner jacket is beige horn buttons, as opposed to mother of pearl buttons or fabric-covered buttons. But since this dinner jacket is made of linen, the horn buttons and notch lapels make it possibly for this dinner jacket to double as a sports coat. Otherwise, this is still a white dinner jacket, with its button one front and jetted pockets. It also has 4-button cuffs and double vents. The shoulders are soft on the natural shoulder line and have roped sleeveheads. The cut is slightly draped with a nipped waist.

The straight-leg trousers are black with a satin stripe down each leg, and the black bow tie is in matching satin silk. Bond’s white dress shirt has a spread collar, double cuffs, a pleated front and mother of pearl buttons. Bond also briefly wears a pair of sunglasses (with the ability to see through tinted glass). Does anyone know the origin of these sunglasses.

12 thoughts on “White Dinner Jacket in the Country

  1. The context is a little unusual alright (although high Summer close to Paris can be quite warm). It begs the question; why wouldn’t Moore’s Bond have not opted for the white/ivory version of this outfit for Dinner with Kristatos on Corfu or for his meeting in the Mojave Club in Egypt?

    I guess the producers tailored their Bond to Moore’s image and his Bond was particularly fond of sporting a dinner suit and to that end they needed to vary things. He’d already worn a dark one for his dinner on the Eiffel tower earlier in this movie and so some variation was called for.

    The slight faux pas is not new either. Connery's Bond wore a white dinner jacket to a Las Vegas amusement arcade and casino in which nobody else was similarly dressed in Diamonds are Forever (but then a lot in that movie was way OTT)

    What material do you think this particular jacket is made from?

  2. Jenny Flex does say the reception begins at 6, and although it is still light out as it is summer, I believe black tie is the appropriate choice here. As for the white dinner jacket, that's still up for discussion.

  3. No pocket square and the bow tie appears to be pre-tied.

    I'm sorry, but he looks like a waiter, not 007…

    Or wait, I can't remember this scene, wasn't he pretending to be a waiter? That would make sense.

  4. So it is after six, after all. It's June, so that's would explain why it's so light outside. But I'm sure it was filmed earlier than 6 because it's awfully sunny out in some of the shots.

    But that's certainly a real bow tie.

  5. Sunset in Chantilly in June would be just shy of 10pm, so assuming a 6pm reception the light levels seem OK to me.

    Mind you, seeing a black tie party in the still fairly bright light in an early summer evening never seems odd to me; I live in Southern England, so the hours of sunrise and sunset are similarly extended in summertime.

  6. The glasses look like Persol 714 around the bridge and frames. Tinkered with by Q-branch naturally

  7. They have the same kind of feel as the Persol 714, but these are much rounder (practically circular lenses).

  8. The PO3002 look about right, even has the strip across the top of the frames.
    Also regarding the outfit remember he is under cover as St John-Smyth. This may explain the ostentatious ring and shades.

  9. Who manufactured those sunglasses has bugged me for 26 years. The strip on the PO3002 is from a clip-on and the nose bridge is set lower than Bonds which also sport an integrated strip across the frames. One guess could be that they're vintage Persols, but I've never seen anything like them.

    It would be odd if they were cheap brandless ones since Moores wardrobe and accessories are as well picked in AVTAK as in any other of his films (Burberry tie, Vuitton luggage etc.)

  10. Most likely they are not Persol frames as they are missing the identifying Meflecto hinge. The lenses are most definitely perfect rounds and the bridge is made of a lighter colour acetate, which as Victor says does not look like the PO3002 clip-on. Other identifying characteristics is the chunky, notched key-hole bridge and protruding endpieces. OHM is only assumed to mean On Her Majesty (secret service). One would think an eyeglass brandname would not be present on the lens unless on purpose at this time.
    Still looking for the brand & model info!

  11. Just an idea on the context of the outfit, Bond is under cover as James St. John-Smythe. He is posing as a very wealthy man who either is into horses or just inherited some and is looking to start breeding, I can’t remember exactly but either way he’s there to purchase horses for thousands if not millions of pounds. This persona calls for a bit of flamboyance perhaps even faux luxury, note at this same party is a Texas oilman and Zorin himself is in technology neither are traditionally aristocratic sources of wealth. So Bonds cover fits the other guests and in theory he should not stand out. This cover would explain the untraditional or unrefined decisions made by Bond in this scene.

    I too am unable to figure out the maker of these sunglasses and it is maddeningly annoying. Just because they are missing the Meflecto hinge or the silver arrow does not mean they are not Persols. I have seen some without those elements, however I don’t believe the glasses are Persols. I have come up with a theory though that they were not made by a dedicated sunglasses company like Persol, perhaps they were made by a label that does not solely produce sunglasses e.g. Hermes or Yves Saint Laurent. I do not know much about vintage sunglasses by such labels and maybe there are distinct marks missing or present on the glasses which would debunk my theory but its just an idea.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

− 3 = four

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>